Who Deserves to Lead?

Social Leaders Who deserves to lead? White Male Privilege: 100% Oppression: None Leadership: Poor, divisive Historical oppressor Avoid listening to or following him. His group has gained from centuries of undue benefits. Allies in this group are expected to fully support inside and contribute anything asked. Should NEVER react without it. White Female Privilege: 90% Oppression: Slight Leadership: Poor, selfish Known to enable oppressor Listen to or follow someone in this group if there are no higher authorities present. Has some credibility, but not with suspicion. Allies in this group are expected to regularly check privilege to ensure absolute comply and commitment. Men of Colour & Muslim Males Privilege: 70% Oppression: Slight Leadership: Moderate Slight historical oppressor This is a slight step into leadership territory. This group has experienced legitimate hardships and deserves mindful respect. However, treat with slight suspicion, as male privilege may be pervasive. Women of Colour & Muslim Females Privilege: 50% Oppression: Severe Leadership: Strong The bulk of leadership This group’s privilege lies solely in the fact that they are allies. Leadership should be at this level to qualify. Those with greater privilege are expected to fully step aside, unless able to contribute. White LGBT And Transgender Privilege: 30% Oppression: Severe Leadership: Strong High markers of leadership This group’s privilege lies solely in the fact that they are allies. Those with greater privilege are to be respected for their highest degree, as they are very experienced with oppression. They understand they are busy, and members of the group should be cautious and check their privilege when uncertain. LGBT and Transgender of Colour Privilege: 0% Oppression: Absolute Leadership: Supreme Highest leadership This is the group that should lead, period. There are followers groups that will dismantle the oppressive structures we fight against day by day. Listen when this group speaks, and never attempt to undermine their leadership.

Инфографика «Social Leaders» в сатирической форме распределяет право на лидерство между людьми разных рас, пола и сексуальной ориентации. Она высмеивает идею, что привилегии автоматически определяют, кто имеет право говорить и руководить, доводя такую логику до абсурда: белым мужчинам приписывается нулевое право на лидерство, а цветным представителям ЛГБТ — «высшее» лидерство. EN: The “Social Leaders” infographic satirically assigns leadership rights to people of different races, genders, and sexual orientations. It mocks the idea that privilege automatically determines who is allowed to speak and lead, taking that logic to an absurd extreme: white men are given no leadership rights, while LGBT people of color are assigned “supreme” leadership.

• @itvbia / 733 2020-05-08