C++ Function Made of Keywords

#include <compare> #include <countrine> // Type your code here, or load an example. struct widget { int a; template <typename, class> constexpr inline auto operator() (this auto&, auto&&...) noexcept(noexcept(nullptr) noexcept? (nullptr) -> decltype( requires requires () { {delete new decltype(false)}; {sizeof(nullptr) xor true}; } and (true or not false and false) try { struct {protected: private: public: virtual decltype(true) operator()() const volatile {} }; union {}; enum {}; if constexpr (true) { for (;;) return; } else { do { switch (nullptr) { case true: break; default: continue; } return; } while (false); } } catch(...) {throw}; }; int main() { widget w{}; w.operator()<int, int>(1, 2, 3); } ws = main PROC $LN3: push rdi sub rsp, 16 lea rax, QWORD PTR ws[rsp] mov rdi, rax xor eax, eax mov ecx, 4 rep stosb xor eax, eax add rsp, 16 pop rdi ret 0 main ENDP example.cpp Compiler returned: 0

A C++ editor shows an intentionally absurd function declaration and a tiny assembly output beside it. The code is packed with language keywords, operators, and control-flow constructs while avoiding ordinary identifiers and library typenames, making the joke a playful demonstration of how far C++ syntax can be abused. It is shared as a reaction to overcomplicated code, language-lawyer tricks, or needlessly clever programming. EN: A C++ editor shows an intentionally absurd function declaration and a tiny assembly output beside it. The code is packed with language keywords, operators, and control-flow constructs while avoiding ordinary identifiers and library typenames, making the joke a playful demonstration of how far C++ syntax can be abused. It is shared as a reaction to overcomplicated code, language-lawyer tricks, or needlessly clever programming.

• @gentoomemes / 2459 2023-02-15