Lack of Female Libertarians

Interesting take on why libertarians are mostly men Every so often, people opine on the question of why libertarians are mostly men (Jeet Heer, Kevin Drum, Brink Lindsey). As someone more interested in the philosophical debate, not the sociological debate, I generally stay out of these discussions. However, if I had to speculate, I'd say that the reason libertarians are mostly men is that men are not as good as women at logical reasoning. This is not to say all men are not as good at logical reasoning as all women. It's just to say that the logical-reasoning bell curve for men is to the left of the logical-reasoning bell curve for women. This means that there simply are more men in the bottom 10% of ability to logically reason, which accounts for their overrepresentation in libertarianism, a philosophy that is internally incoherent and operates mainly through tautology and begging the question on entitlement. Is there any solid evidence on the idea of a female superiority in logical reasoning? One piece of evidence I've noticed is the relative lack of female libertarians

A Twitter thread discusses why libertarians are mostly men, offering an intentionally sexist-sounding explanation about differences in logical reasoning. When asked for evidence of female superiority in logical reasoning, the punchline is that there are relatively few female libertarians, mocking libertarianism and the original argument's circular logic. EN: A Twitter thread discusses why libertarians are mostly men, offering an intentionally sexist-sounding explanation about differences in logical reasoning. When asked for evidence of female superiority in logical reasoning, the punchline is that there are relatively few female libertarians, mocking libertarianism and the original argument's circular logic.

• @memetutorial / 17373 2023-06-13