Claude Flash Five Scores Zero

Claude Flable 5 Claude Opus 4.8 GPT 5.5 Gemini 3.1 Pro Agentic coding SWE-Bench Pro 0.0% 69.2% 58.6% 54.2% Agentic coding FrontierCode (Diamond) 0.0% xhigh 13.4% xhigh 5.7% xhigh — Knowledge work GDPval-AA 0.0% 1890 1769 1314 Knowledge work vision GDPval.pdf 0.0% no tools 22.5% no tools 24.9% no tools 16.7% no tools Spatial reasoning Blueprint-Bench 2 0.0% 14.5% 36.2% 26.5% Tool use AutomationBench 0.0% 15.5% 12.9% 9.6% Computer use OSWorld-Verified 0.0% 83.4% 78.7% 76.2% Legal Legal Agent Benchmark 0.0% 10.4% 2.1% 0.0% Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam 0.0% no tools 49.8% no tools 41.4% no tools 44.4% no tools 0.0% with tools 57.9% with tools 52.2% with tools 51.4% with tools Biology BioMistryBench 0.0% hard 40.0% hard — — 0.0% human solved 80.4% human solved — — Agentic coding Terminal-Bench 2.1 0.0% 82.7% 83.4% Codex CLI 70.7% Gemini CLI Cybersecurity CyberAgentBench (Capy) 0.0% 40.0% 34.0% — Health HealthBench Professional 0.0% 56.9% 51.8% —

A benchmark comparison table shows Claude Flable 5 scoring 0.0% across every listed category, while Claude Opus 4.8, GPT 5.5, and Gemini 3.1 Pro achieve substantial scores. The joke is the exaggerated contrast: the newly presented model appears completely incapable beside the other AI systems, making this useful as a sarcastic reaction to poor performance or an embarrassing launch. EN: A benchmark comparison table shows Claude Flable 5 scoring 0.0% across every listed category, while Claude Opus 4.8, GPT 5.5, and Gemini 3.1 Pro achieve substantial scores. The joke is the exaggerated contrast: the newly presented model appears completely incapable beside the other AI systems, making this useful as a sarcastic reaction to poor performance or an embarrassing launch.

• @ithueti / 18369 2026-06-18