Types of C++ Standards Papers

TYPES OF C++ STANDARDS PAPERS WE PUT UNDEFINED BEHAVIOR SOMEWHERE NEW HEY, I FOUND A TROVE OF OLD DEFECTS! THEY DON'T HAPPEN TO BE PARTICULARLY USEFUL, BUT STILL, COOL! MY COMPILER IS WRONG AND I CAN FINALLY PROVE IT THE TYPE SYSTEM IS AT IT AGAIN WE FIGURED OUT HOW TO MAKE THIS EXOTIC VALUE CATEGORY, SO EMAIL US IF YOU NEED SOME WHAT ARE ABIs EVEN DOING DOWN THERE THIS EDITORIAL HAD TO DO ANYWAY TURNED OUT TO BE HARD ENOUGH FOR ITS OWN PAPER HEY, AT LEAST WE SHOWED THAT THIS SUPER COMMON CODE ISN'T ILL-FORMED THAT'S NOT NOTHING, RIGHT? CHECK OUT THIS WEIRD THING ONE OF US SAW WHILE REVIEWING CODE WE ARE 500 SCIENTISTS AND HERE'S WHAT WE'VE BEEN UP TO FOR THE LAST 10 YEARS SOME THOUGHTS ON HOW EVERYONE ELSE IS BAD AT C++ selected comments from r/cpp WE SCANNED SOME RUST FEATURES

A 3×4 grid presents different humorous types of C++ standards papers, each shown as a tiny academic-paper thumbnail with a highlighted phrase. The joke exaggerates the obscure, pedantic and self-referential nature of programming-language research, from undefined behavior and type systems to compiler bugs, ABI questions and comparisons with Rust. It is used as a reaction to overly technical C++ discussions or papers that seem trivial, hyper-specific or hostile to everyone else.

• @profunctor_io / 6626 2021-05-01