Programming Languages Outside Inside

Outside Inside Rust Safety unsafe { 💩 } Python Easy 💩 = CDLL("💩.so") 💩 💩() JavaScript $ du -sh 💩_modules 100G 💩_modules Haskell Pure Functional how(to(do(real( things(in(pure( language(💩 ))))))) C++ Safety Easy Pure Functional 初中生也能搞全栈

A comparison chart shows programming languages as boxes labeled with their supposed qualities on the outside and absurd or unpleasant realities inside. Rust is presented as safe, Python as easy, JavaScript as enormous dependency bloat, Haskell as pure functional abstraction, and C++ as containing all of these plus poop. The joke is a satirical stereotype-based reaction to the strengths and frustrations of different programming languages. EN: A comparison chart shows programming languages as boxes labeled with their supposed qualities on the outside and absurd or unpleasant realities inside. Rust is presented as safe, Python as easy, JavaScript as enormous dependency bloat, Haskell as pure functional abstraction, and C++ as containing all of these plus poop. The joke is a satirical stereotype-based reaction to the strengths and frustrations of different programming languages.

• @ithueti / 12068 2024-03-05