Stop Doing Async

STOP DOING Async • Concurrency was NOT SUPPOSED TO BE Abstracted • YEARS OF coding yet NO REAL-WORLD USE FOUND for multi-core applications • Wanted to go parallel anyway for a laugh? We had a tool for that: It was called multiprocessing.Process(target=f, args=(...) • “Yes please give me a wait of some unit. Please async for Fall in generator: log(data)” - Statements dreamed up by the utterly Deranged LOOK at what Pythonists have been demanding your Respect for all this time, with all the async loops & awaits we built for them (This is REAL code, done by REAL programmers) “Hello I would like async apples please” They have played us for absolute fools

A parody poster attacks the overuse of asynchronous programming, showing a block of Python code and mocking programmers who demand respect for async loops and awaits. The punchline is the absurd request for “async apples,” portraying async programming as confusing, overcomplicated jargon with little real-world value. It is shared as a sarcastic reaction to excessive abstraction, overengineering, or enthusiastic software-development trends. EN: A parody poster attacks the overuse of asynchronous programming, showing a block of Python code and mocking programmers who demand respect for async loops and awaits. The punchline is the absurd request for “async apples,” portraying async programming as confusing, overcomplicated jargon with little real-world value. It is shared as a sarcastic reaction to excessive abstraction, overengineering, or enthusiastic software-development trends.

• @right_wing_dev_squads / 6860 2023-06-03