EventEmitter7 We Need to Go Deeper

EventEmitter3 - Because there's also a number 2. And we're faster. eventemitter4 0.2.4 • Public • Published 4 years ago Readme 1. Dependencies 5 Dependencies EventEmitter4 1. Synopsis 2. Installation 3. Browser support 9.6. Why not EventEmitter3 EventEmitter3 does not have an onAny() function. The module is not implemented using any form of set algebra either. Therefore, I did not particularly feel like extending it. eventemitter5 1.2.4 • Public • Published 3 years ago Readme 0 Dependencies 1 Dependencies EventEmitter5 Because there is an EventEmitter, EventEmitter2, EventEmitter3 and EventEmitter4. Let's end the insanity and work together to fix the existing EventEmitter projects. Keywords eventemitter6 1.0.1 • Public • Published 2 years ago Readme 5 Dependencies 0 EventEmitter6 Because there is an EventEmitter, EventEmitter2, EventEmitter3, EventEmitter4, and EventEmitter5. That's a hell of them, and because there is no setMaxEventEmitterPkg, let's make EventEmitter great again! And we will make listeners pay for it! Dependencies (5) EventEmitter eventemitter2 eventemitter3 eventemitter4 eventemitter5 🤯 Eventemitter 7 We need to go deeper

A vertically stacked screenshot shows successive EventEmitter packages—EventEmitter4, EventEmitter5, EventEmitter6, and finally EventEmitter7—each attempting to explain or supersede the previous versions. The joke parodies competing standards and endless software package proliferation: every attempt to consolidate the ecosystem creates yet another competing implementation, ending with the absurd promise to “go deeper.” EN: A vertically stacked screenshot shows successive EventEmitter packages—EventEmitter4, EventEmitter5, EventEmitter6, and finally EventEmitter7—each attempting to explain or supersede the previous versions. The joke parodies competing standards and endless software package proliferation: every attempt to consolidate the ecosystem creates yet another competing implementation, ending with the absurd promise to “go deeper.”

• @dev_meme / 376 2019-05-18