Arch Elitists vs Windows Elitists

You've seen Arch elitists, now get ready for Windows elitists Literally anything in POSIX is absolute garbage. While it's not clear what problem you are trying to solve, you can rest assured, that Windows offers something that's way better than what you have asked for. But then, you'd have to explain the problem (not your solution). Are you trying to solve a particular issue with the remote procedure call infrastructure that's already provided by the system? That's Windows specific, I'm trying for something portable. Just so that I understand: You (potentially) have a solution that's (potentially) optimal, but now you wish to depart from that solution, and implement one that's shitty, because it has to be implementable on shitty systems that run on shitty kernels. Is that approximately correct? My project is cross-platform because it's meant to work with a cross-platform emulator. Making it Windows-only would exclude a significant number of MacOS and Linux users.

Мем состоит из заголовка и скриншота дискуссии в стиле Reddit о Windows, Arch, POSIX и переносимости программ. Участники спорят, что Windows предлагает готовое решение, но автор проекта хочет кроссплатформенность, из-за чего его высмеивают за отказ от якобы оптимального решения ради поддержки «shitty systems». Мем отправляют как саркастическую реакцию на чрезмерный техноэлитизм и токсичные споры о выборе операционной системы.

• @dev_meme / 4857 2022-09-11
• @gentoomemes / 903 2022-09-11
• @right_wing_dev_squads / 8046 2023-11-11