Codebase Is Not AI-Complete

Codebase is not AI-complete #1 There are several instances of malloc and realloc in mallocPlusAI.h. This is unacceptable as we can not expect for these to be correct without AI intervention. Proper handling of these cases should be of paramount importance to ensure that this important implementation does not fall foul to memory issues caused by human fallibility. Perhaps it would be wise to embed a tiny model inside of the library itself, and copy over the entirety of llama.cpp to allocate initial memory before it can be delegated to a web server. EDIT: Oh no. llama.cpp has human malloc's I am unsure how to proceed following this revelation. We should use the tensorflow network as our swap memory to avoid realloc malloc. We should also think about using fp32 as our front mallocAI frontend

A dark-themed issue thread jokes about discovering human-written memory allocation code in an allegedly AI-complete codebase. The commenters escalate the absurdity by proposing embedded models, TensorFlow as swap memory, and an fp32 mallocAI frontend, parodying overreliance on AI and buzzword-heavy software engineering.

• @right_wing_dev_squads / 14567 2026-06-18