Virgin Rust vs Chad C++

THE VIRGIN RUST need to use unsafe blocks to make programming exciting cannot write a compile-time raytracer no feeling of reward when dealing with complicated library dependency graphs only requires you to write function definitions once instead of three times doesn't let you spawn array elements assumes you can't keep track of object lifetimes in your head you don't have to creatively implement your memory management by abusing lambdas THE CHAD C++ multiple compilers, each one with different bugs provides several ways of initializing variables to promote diversity sometimes segfaults to keep you on your toes literally has 3 or 4 accidentally turning complete languages embedded into it allows you to create compile-time tetris provides job security never removes features for perfect backward compatibility fast like sonic it's probably UB

A Virgin vs Chad comparison contrasts Rust’s strict safety rules and repetitive programming with C++’s chaotic flexibility and legacy features. The joke celebrates C++’s bugs, undefined behavior, and complexity as exciting advantages, so it is often sent as an ironic programming-language reaction.

• @profunctor_io / 577 2018-01-23
• @ithueti / 109 2018-01-24
• @right_wing_dev_squads / 2887 2021-11-12
• @ithueti / 7171 2022-07-25
• @dev_meme / 4743 2022-08-09
• @right_wing_dev_squads / 7428 2023-08-20