Virgin Firefox vs Chad Chrome

virgin Firefox Chad Chrome named after an animal, srsly? no one even knows after which one even the logo's designer doesn't know after which animal it's actually named had to invent its own language to avoid memory and threading bugs, causes headaches to package maintainers because of that worries about its market share, so improves itself as much as possible can't get specs done right on its own, has to work closely with spec authors to achieve that cares about your privacy as if that's something you really need thinks people need row-gap and col-gap in flexbox plays clear sound, putting you at risk of getting deaf explains why a CSS property doesn't apply and how to fix that scrolls between CSS scroll snap points smoothly pretending to care about UX will obediently get a clip-path mask from external file only one app, Thunderbird, is built upon Firefox naively believes that many browser engines are good for competition named after the greatest chemical element gap ought be enough for anybody the logo accurately depicts the atom's structure goes outta be enough for anybody written entirely in Chad C++, gives no fuck about vulnerabilities jumps between CSS scroll snap points, sometimes even between two snap points at once, actually caring about UX doesn't tell if some property can't be applied, teaching devs to pay attention to details knows from practice that the only true way to achieve web compatibility is to make every browser switch to Chromium runs in space, and already the most popular browser, doesn't have to give a fuck about it only terrorists care about it doesn't give a fuck about your privacy because only terrorists care about it implements cool features itself and enables them for all users, some lime later writes specs for them without others' help hundreds and thousands of great (in size) apps are built upon Chromium will ignore external files in clip-path to save a couple kbytes for the user makes sound as dyoty as pozibel, karing aboud ur ear

A two-panel “Virgin Firefox vs Chad Chrome” comparison presents Firefox as an overthinking, privacy-focused browser burdened by technical limitations, while Chrome is portrayed as an irreverent, dominant browser that ignores standards and privacy concerns. The joke exaggerates common developer frustrations and browser-engine politics, making Chrome look “Chad” because it powers most of the web despite its flaws.

• @profunctor_io / 5403 2020-09-18