Open Source License Rant

You should never, EVER open source anything. It's the most pointless, thankless thing you could ever do in your entire life. Giving food to the homeless is more rewarding because there's a chance they won't spit in your face as a way of saying "thanks". First of all - are you sure you've covered all the usecases? Are you smart enough for that? Apparently not, because your code didn't work for @TalentlessFaggot69. Are you gonna fix that? When? Give me a fucking estimate. Do it yourself, it's your code. No, I'm not gonna pay you for it. Do it. You've open sourced it you retard. Second - imagine if you're actually so good that your piece of code actually works. And maybe you won't even get absolutely retarded Issues from people wishing your inventory management code could also do combat mechanics. Do you know what that means? That means your code will be used for commercial products by other, smarter devs. >"Well, that's fine, I'm glad I helped them" "Hey, give me your wife for a moment, I'm sure you'll be glad to help me dump my nut into her asshole." >"I'll just add GPL2 so they will have to opensource it!" Good job, you retard, now your project is dead because no smart man will touch that cancer license with a 10 foot pole. Smart devs use open source tools. Cucks produce open source tools. Simple as.

A 4chan-style rant argues that developers should never open-source their own software because users will demand unpaid fixes, request unrelated features, and exploit the work commercially. The punchline compares helping open-source users to an absurdly vulgar favor, then mocks the idea of using the GPL2 license as protection. It is used as a sarcastic reaction to complaints about open-source software and entitlement from users or developers.

• @right_wing_dev_squads / 14053 2026-03-20
• @right_wing_dev_squads / 14267 2026-04-25